Choosing The ‘Right’ Arbitration Institution—Guidance for Businesses On Costs

April 16, 2018 - Arbitration analysis: Pelin Baysal (Deputy Board Member of ISTA) and Bilge Kağan Çevik of Turkish law firm Gün + Partners discuss the relevance of costs when concluding an arbitration agreement where the parties have settled on institutional rather than ad hoc arbitration.

They had selected five arbitration institutions that they believe represent a well-rounded mix with regards to their relevance, reputation, geographic location, and cultural preference, namely:

· the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce(ICC)

· the London Court of International Arbitration(LCIA)

· the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce(SCC)

· the Singapore International Arbitration Centre(SIAC)

· the Istanbul Arbitration Centre(ISTAC)

As for selecting the ‘right’ arbitration institution, numbers often speak louder than words. In a survey carried out by the Queen Mary, University of London School of International Arbitration in 2010, when selecting an arbitration institute, 46% of the interviewees considered the arbitration rules as an important factor while 41% considered the overall cost of service as an important factor. It is no surprise that for businesses, it is the cost of arbitration that captures their interest. Although the cost of arbitration may not have an impact on the merits of the case, for businesses, cost may sometimes be the determinative factor on whether to pursue arbitration or not.

For this reason, this article (the first in a two part series) compares the overall costs of the arbitration institutions mentioned above. The second part will provide a detailed comparison of the institutions’ arbitration rules. Having compared different arbitration rules and their costs, the aim is to enable businesses to find the ‘right’ arbitration institution for the dispute in hand.

Full Text: Gun + Partners;

Yazar: ISTA

Etiketler: ICC ISTAC LCIA Arbitration Centers SCC SIAC

Kategori: Tahkim Merkezleri


Last Posts

Should Arbitral Institutions Have Diplomatic Immunity?

In November 2018, the former director of the Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC) in Kuala Lumpur resigned from his role after being arrested on suspicions that he paid past and present minis...

Read More

Tags: Etik Kurumsal Tahkim Dokunulmazlık

Res Judicata: An Analysis for the Sake of Public Policy

The principle of res judicata is a universal principle recognized by the legal systems of all civilized nations. The res judicata principle should be applied by arbitral tribunals as the arbitral trib...

Read More

Tags: İcra Edilebilirlik Hakem Kararlarının İcrası Kamu Düzeni

End of a long-lasting debate on the legal nature of arbitration agreements in Turkey?

In its recently published decision, numbered 2016/2 E and 2018/4 K and dated 13 April 2018, the General Assembly of Civil Chambers in Turkey decided that an arbitration agreement had a procedural natu...

Read More

Tags: Tahkim Etiği Tahkim Kanunları Tahkim Anlaşmaları

ICCA and IBA establish task force on data protection

ICCA and the IBA have joined forces to produce a guide to one of the most challenging current issues in international arbitration: data protection.For the full text: ICCA(International Council For Com...

Read More

Tags: Etik Veri koruma Uluslararası Tahkim


ISTA is organising an international conference on 16 November 2018 in Istanbul. This high-level international event will focus on the ISTA Code of Ethics, as well as recent developments and innovation...

Read More

Tags: ISTA